One person is dead and at least three injured after a shooting at YouTube’s headquarters in San Bruno, California. The San Bruno chief of police, Ed Barberini, confirms a woman, believed to be the shooter, died at the scene and that four people were taken to hospital, three with gunshot wounds
The Arizona senator has been absent from the Capitol since December as he receives treatment for brain cancer.
The president and military and administration officials offer dueling visions of the U.S. role in Syria.
- Latest move in Donald Trump’s trade confrontation with Beijing
- List includes electronics, aircraft parts, medicine and other goods
US officials published a list on Tuesday of $50bn in Chinese imports set to be targeted by US tariffs, the latest move in Donald Trump’s simmering trade confrontation with Beijing.
The list – which includes electronics, aircraft parts, medicine, machinery and other goods – has yet to be finalized and is intended as a response to China’s alleged theft of American companies’ intellectual property and technology.
Police say they have no details about motive in attack at company’s California headquarters as victims are treated at nearby hospital
A shooting at YouTube’s California headquarters left at least three people wounded and a female suspect dead of an apparent suicide, police said Tuesday.
The San Bruno police chief, Ed Barberini, said during a news conference that police had responded to 911 calls from the Silicon Valley tech campus and discovered a woman, whom they believed to be the shooter, dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Barberini said they did not have any details about a possible motive or the kind of firearm used. He added that the police had no reason to believe there was a second shooter but that the investigation continued.
The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. thought that white Christians turned a blind eye to racism. Now some in the group agree.
Democrats hope to narrow a conservative majority on the state’s court, with outside help
The law increasingly appears to favor police in excessive-force cases.
A court ruled today that the Environmental Protection Agency violated its duty to respond to civil rights complaints in a timely way. The case involved five organizations that had waited years for the EPA to respond to complaints filed under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, creed, or color.
The law requires the EPA to respond to parties that file civil rights complaints within 20 days, letting them know whether the agency plans to conduct an investigation. After opening an investigation, the EPA has 180 days to either dismiss a complaint or issue preliminary findings and recommendations based on what it finds in the investigation. But in each of the five cases, the groups waited years — in some cases, decades — for responses from the agency.
Among the groups suing Scott Pruitt and the EPA were Citizens for Alternatives to Radioactive Dumping, a nonprofit in Albuquerque, which filed a complaint in 2002 over a hazardous waste facility in a mostly poor, Hispanic area of southeastern New Mexico; and Californians for Renewable Energy, which in 2000 challenged state permitting decisions that allowed two gas-fired power plants to be located in a mostly nonwhite, low-income community in Pittsburg, California.
The EPA officially resolved all five of the complaints over the last year, declaring them closed with little or no remedy. But none of the groups, which were based in Alabama, Texas, New Mexico, California, and Michigan, feel that the situations sparking their initial complaints have been adequately addressed.
With help from Earthjustice and the Environmental Justice Clinic at Yale Law School, the groups filed a complaint in 2015 arguing that the EPA had defied the law that lays out a schedule for responding to civil rights claims. In a decision dated March 30, Federal District Court Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong agreed.
“The EPA often takes years to act on a complaint — and even then, acts only after a lawsuit has been filed,” Armstrong wrote in her decision, going on to note that “the EPA has allowed Plaintiffs’ complaints to languish for decades.”
An EPA spokesperson responded to a request for comment with an email saying, “We don’t comment on pending litigation.”
Much environmental harm was done in those years. In Charlton-Pollard, Texas, an ExxonMobil refinery emitted more than 400 million pounds of pollution into the air between 2000, when residents filed a civil rights complaint with the EPA over the state’s permitting of the refinery, and 2017, when the agency declared the complaint resolved. The original complaint in this case had requested that the EPA require Texas to revoke a permit it had granted to the refinery in 1999. But that never happened, and the refinery was recently granted permits to expand its operations.
In Flint, Michigan, the incinerator at the center of the civil rights complaint has been operating for 23 years. During that time, the plant has been emitting lead and other contaminants into the air, and three of the four original complainants have died.
Father Philip Schmitter, the only surviving member of the original group that formed to stop the incinerator from being built, said he was pleased with the decision even as he considered it “a drop in the bucket.”
“I’m delighted for the poor and African-Americans in Flint, and I’m delighted on behalf of those who died after working hard to get this day to happen,” said Schmitter, who began work fighting the incinerator in his 40s and is now 72. “But we still have to get to the table with the EPA and say, ‘What are we really going to do to make this better?’”
Indeed, though the decision clearly finds that the EPA failed to issue timely responses to civil rights complaints, it doesn’t address the adequacy of the responses the agency eventually made.
Still, Marianne Engelman-Lado, a visiting clinical professor of law at Yale Law School and one of the attorneys representing the groups, said she is thrilled by the decision. “It doesn’t immediately lessen the amount of pollution people are facing as the result of a legacy of inaction,” said Engelman-Lado. “But having a court tell you that you’re not abiding by the law and you must do so makes a difference.”
The post EPA Violated the Law by Failing to Respond to Civil Rights Complaints, Court Rules appeared first on The Intercept.
Barack Obama sent 1,200 members of the National Guard to the frontier in 2010, following George W Bush’s decision four years earlier to boost the military presence there
Despite his claim on Tuesday that he is taking an almost unprecedented step, Donald Trump is not the first commander in chief to deploy troops to the US-Mexico border.
Barack Obama sent 1,200 members of the National Guard to the frontier in 2010, following on from George W Bush’s decision four years earlier to boost the military presence there.