Real disposable incomes have fallen, mostly because of a rise in inflation, new figures indicate.
After years of bashing Obamacare, GOP now tries to blame Democrats for not helping on health-care overhaul.
Last weekend, the government of Canada did something its U.S. counterpart never has. As part of a legal settlement, Canada agreed to pay $10 million in damages to a former Guantanamo detainee and U.S. torture victim.
Seven years after the Canadian Supreme Court ruled that a citizen’s rights had been violated by his own government because of his detention and alleged torture in U.S. custody, former Guantanamo detainee Omar Khadr settled a lawsuit with the government for an apology and millions of dollars.
“Canada should be commended for taking this step,” said Laura Pitter, senior national security counsel for Human Rights Watch. “Unfortunately, the U.S. government, most responsible for Khadr’s mistreatment, has failed to fulfill its obligation to provide compensation and redress, not just in Khadr’s case but in the case of scores of other men wrongfully detained and tortured in U.S. custody.”
In 2015, after spending a decade in Guantanamo and 3 years in a maximum-security prison in Ontario, the Canadian government released 28-year-old Khadr on bail. Khadr was only 15 in 2002 when he was captured, accused of throwing a grenade that killed an American soldier during a firefight at a suspected Al Qaeda compound.
He became the youngest prisoner ever held at Guantanamo Bay. Instead of treating Khadr like a child soldier and demanding his rehabilitation, the Canadian government sent intelligence agents to interrogate him. According court affidavits, Khadr told visiting Canadian officials that he had confessed under torture. He claims to have shown them his injuries, but the officials refused to help.
The details of Khadr’s decade-long legal battle are complicated, but the result is simple: Khadr, now 30 and released on bail, settled a lawsuit against the government for $10 million and an apology.
This is not the first time Canada has made payments to victims of U.S. torture. In 2007, the Conservative Canadian government agreed to pay $10 million to Maher Arar, another Canadian national, over its role in his rendition by the U.S. to Syria and subsequent torture. Three months ago, Canada agreed to pay three more torture victims whom they had helped render to foreign prisons.
And Canada is not alone. In 2008, Sweden paid $500,000 to a former terror suspect for handing him over to U.S. officials in 2002, who sent him to Egypt to be tortured. In 2010, Britain agreed to pay millions of pounds to 16 former Guantanamo detainees because of its role in their U.S. detention. The same year, Australia reached an settlement with Mamdouh Habib – an Australian national held at Guantanamo — for an undisclosed amount of money.
The U.S., however, has yet to pay out a cent in legal settlements to the 700-some-odd men it has released from Guantanamo Bay who were all held without charge. And the U.S. has never compensated, let alone apologized, to any of its post-9/11 torture victims.
“I can’t remember any settlement awarding damages to Guantanamo detainees, nor I think to a victim of U.S. torture,” said Dror Ladin, an attorney with the ACLU who specializes in detention-related abuses, referring to the absence of U.S. compensation to its victims.
Part of the reason, according to Ladin, is that Congress passed a law in 2006 trying to prevent exactly that. The law bars courts from hearing detention-related damage claims from any non-citizen the US has designated as an “enemy combatant.”
Ladin said the measure had been used by federal courts to dismiss at least three lawsuits from Guantanamo detainees. “There’re real constitutional questions that are raised by leaving people without any remedy for constitutional violations,” Ladin said.
Another major obstacle to restitution for torture victims is that the U.S. broadly interprets certain immunity doctrines for national security officials. In 2012, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a lawsuit against John Yoo — the author of the so-called torture memos, the rationale the Bush administration used to justify harsh interrogations after 9/11 — arguing he had immunity because the definition of torture wasn’t firmly established.
Other cases have been thrown out because of secrecy, or on purely procedural grounds. The Obama administration invoked the state secrets privilege in 2010 to block a lawsuit against a Boeing subsidiary for helping the CIA transport detainees to its global network of secret prisons.
In one particularly outrageous case, two U.S. contractors (and citizens) were tortured in a U.S. maximum-security prison in Baghdad after they were wrongly accused of smuggling weapons. But, in 2014, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals denied damages, reasoning on purely procedural grounds that Congress had never legislated a federal cause of action, so they could not be awarded damages.
Ladin said U.S. courts are shy about allowing cases against national security officials to go forward. “Once you talk about cases that are overseas, or cases that involve the military they’re extremely, extremely reluctant to allow those cases to go forward,” Ladin told The Intercept.
The extreme difficulty of holding U.S. officials accountable has enabled abuses beyond torture and indefinite detention. Despite sending some victims money under the table, the Obama administration has repeatedly argued in court that drone strike victims should not be allowed to sue the government for damages.
The post Canada Just Did Something the U.S. Never Has: Paid Millions to a Guantanamo Torture Victim appeared first on The Intercept.
France's ecology minister has laid out an ambitious plan that would see the nation effectively ban the sale of fossil-fuel-powered vehicles by 2040. Nicolas Hulot, as quoted by the Financial Times, claims that France is announcing the "end of the sal…
Arts and crafts chain known for role in contraceptives case to forfeit thousands of tablets and bricks said to have been shipped without proper documentation
The arts and crafts chain Hobby Lobby has agreed to pay a $3m fine and forfeit thousands of smuggled ancient Iraqi artifacts that the US government alleges were intentionally mislabeled, federal prosecutors said.
The Guardian’s picture editors bring you a selection of photo highlights from around the world, including the San Fermin festival in Spain and military parades in Venezuela
The president praised Poland and Polish people in a speech in which he touted Western values.
The president’s foreign policy credentials are about to face their sternest test yet as global opinion of the US plummets
- Michael H Fuchs is a former US deputy assistant secretary of state
Donald Trump will travel to Germany this week to participate in his first G20summit. While most multilateral meetings are full of lofty rhetoric about global cooperation – and feature slightly awkward group photos that resemble a high school yearbook – the G20 meeting appears uniquely engineered to challenge Trump’s foreign policy instincts. Trump may face his most difficult in-person foreign policy test in Hamburg.
Presidential travel is often filled with pomp and circumstance, but such trips can also reveal a president’s true colors. Saudi Arabia – a repressive dictatorship – was Trump’s choice for his first stop in office. While there, Trump made time for meetings with some of the world’s less savory leaders, but had no time for meeting with the members of civil society systematically repressed in the Middle East. In Europe afterwards, he removed language affirming America’s commitment to defend Nato allies from his speech, sending shudders through the continent.